Global capability centers (GCCs) are no longer cost engines in the back office; they are IP factories that drive the GCC digital economy. By 2024-25 India is estimated to have approximately 1,900 GCCs with almost 1.9 million employees and earning billions of dollars in revenues, a level of scale that renders IP leakage and uncontrollable use of AI an existential business threat. The risk has increased by the rate at which AI is being adopted. A recent poll of the industry demonstrates an aggressive increase in the use of AI in the enterprise. In 2024, about 75% of organizations reported using AI, but governance maturity and C-suite satisfaction are lagging behind, creating a gap between control and innovation. One-Line Problem Once a GCC deals with generative models as productivity toys, instead of strategic assets, code, model artifacts, and strategic datasets become mobile IP, subject to shadow AI, contractor churn, and transnational legal ambiguity.
GCCs are growing both geographically and functionally: states and governments are encouraging new GCCs in Tier-2 and Tier-3 urban areas, and firms are relocating more valuable work to these hubs. Significant economic benefits, including lower operating costs, talent accessibility, and time to market, are brought about by the aforementioned growth, but it also raises the stakes in IP governance. The new impetus of policy at the state level indicates how governments view GCCs as sources of national innovation and enforce stricter controls. Rebranding of Governance The conventional perspective of governance as a kind of taxation on speed was traditional compliance. The future perspective should be altered: AI policy frameworks and a sound IP protection architecture can be the competitive advantages that enhance valuation, make the product launches controlled by the regulation quicker, and make global expansion possible. Mature AI programs, such as those that integrate model lineage, watermarking, and audit trails, are quicker because customers and regulators trust them.
GCCs Must Carry Out The Action Plan Steps Incremental AI Auditing—Automatic logs, tamper-evident logs and red-teaming on a regular basis to ensure leakage is detected early.
Controlled AI software shortens the time to market for controlled products, permits the safe commercialisation of models (licensing and APIs), and lowers potential litigation costs: all measurable components of enterprise value. Particularly for GCCs, good governance turns a cost centre into a strategic hub for IP value creation and strengthens these groups’ negotiating position in international organisations. The current market statistics on the GCC revenues and the state strategies point to the ROI potential in the case of balanced governance and innovation.
In the upcoming five years GCCs will be audited in the same way digital sovereigns are now. AI risk KPIs will be expected to be reported by boards, new positions will include Chief IP Security Architect, and traceable model provenance will be a prerequisite to cross-border deployments. GCCs incorporating AI policy frameworks in their product development cycles will win the high-end of being trusted players in the GCC digital economy.
IP-centric AI governance of GCC digital transformation is a fragile approach. There is no middle ground between investing now in governance to transform AI into a guiding force of value and delaying and having proprietary models and strategic datasets become part of competitors’ strategies. AI governance is not a choice, especially in any GCC that plans to become a global capability center, other than an offshore development center.
A GCC is an offshore facility of a multinational company that undertakes niche roles such as research and development, information technology service and strategic management. It is a government program that gives the women entrepreneurs up to 1 crore in bank loans to fund greenfield projects. Personal responsibilities and unconscious bias are the factors that lead to their mid-career attrition and slow them down in their careers. They introduce new ideas, understanding, and team-oriented leadership that speeds up the advancement of such areas as AI and cybersecurity. By 2030, women are expected to take up 25-30 per cent of GCC leadership positions, which will be paramount to the growth of the Indian market. Aditi, with a strong background in forensic science and biotechnology, brings an innovative scientific perspective to her work. Her expertise spans research, analytics, and strategic advisory in consulting and GCC environments. She has published numerous research papers and articles. A versatile writer in both technical and creative domains, Aditi excels at translating complex subjects into compelling insights. Which she aligns seamlessly with consulting, advisory domain, and GCC operations. Her ability to bridge science, business, and storytelling positions her as a strategic thinker who can drive data-informed decision-making.
Why Is This Relevant Now?
A Short Strategic Plan
Governance Layer
What it protects
Business outcome
IP Control Architecture (model lineage, watermarking)
Derivative models, training corpora, algorithms.
Registers monetisable IP, licensable
AI Risk Authentication, authorisation, RBAC (roles)
Shadow AI unauthorised model use
More rapid and secure AI project velocity
Regulatory Intelligence Engine
Cross-border compliance (data residency, export rules)
Unblocked market entry; lower legal exposure
Economic Benefits
A Future View
Conclusion
frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Aditi